Respondent
Theme
Теrminology of Museum Studies: Shaping, System-and-Structure Organization, Term Formation.
Defence Date
Annotation
Dissertation for the scholarly degree of Candidate (Linguistics), Specialization
10.02.01 – The Ukrainian Language. – The Ivan Franko National University of
Lviv. – Lviv, 2015.
The dissertation is devoted to the processes and specific features of forming
and developing the Ukrainian term system of Museum Studies as well as the
shaping of museology under conditions of the historical development of the
Ukrainian language. The periodization of the formation of the Museology term
system is motivated by linguistic and extralinguistic factors. The author has
identified major stages in the development of the term system and the specific
features of coining terms. The corpus, which is sourced from contemporary
Ukrainian dictionaries, reference books, manuals in museology, has helped to
analyze the organization of the term system in museology, reveal its lexical and
semantic features, describe ways of forming the terms, distinguish their major
structural models, and measure their productivity, show the influence of foreign
languages on enriching the Ukrainian term system of museology.
According to their hierarchical structure and the amount of the nominative
units, the macro- and micro-groups have been defined in the elaborated lexical and
thematic classification of the Ukrainian term system of museology.
The research investigates a number of semantic relations – hypernymy,
hyponymy, synonymy, antonymy, polysemy etc. – in the term system of Museum
Studies.
The analysis of morphological and syntactic structures proves that the special
feature of the museology lexicon lies in the existence of synthetic (one-component
terms) and analytic terms (term combinations).
The synthetic terms are represented by both derivative and non-derivative
term units. The study of Ukrainian museology terms, esp. their structures, displays
the preservation of this tendency in analytical terms as the majority of present-day
term systems testify to this regularity.
The analysis of word-building structures shows that the development of
Ukrainian museology terms is based on morphologic and non-morphologic
derivation. In the course of coining the museology terms, the morphologic
derivation, represented by prefixation, suffixation, prefixation-suffixation,
composition and abbreviation, is more productive than non-morphologic
derivation, particularly its lexical-semantic and morphological-semantic ways.
The museology term system is formed on the national lexical basis with
accepting direct and indirect lexical loans. The Ukrainian museology term system
is characterized with genetic heterogeneity of term units that reflects the lasting
historical process of developing the term system under study. The overwhelming
majority of the terms are of Latin and Greek origin. The lexicon of terms in
Museum Studies is constantly supplied with derivatives and borrowings from other
European languages, which are later influenced by the grammatical, word-
building, and phonetic laws of the Ukrainian language.
Key words: Ukrainian museology term system, term, lexicon, paradigmatic
relations, lexical and semantic field, derivation of terms, term loan, word-building
means, term combination.