Respondent
Theme
Semantical paradoxicalness of political discourse (theoretical and methodological analysis).
Defence Date
Annotation
A thesis for obtaining the scientific degree of Ph.D in political science by
speciality 23.00.01. – A Theory and History of Political Thought. – Lviv National
University of Ivan Franko. – Lviv, 2016.
The work is devoted to research of institutional political discourse and its
semantic substance. It reveals the history of scientific knowledge about the political
discourse. The autor analyzed the functions and semantic structure of word in
political discourse, revealed its role in the process of nomination, conceptualization
and reference. In the thesis is analized the process of semantic competition and
mechanisms, which restrict access to political discourse. There are investigated
differences between professional and public sphere of using of political concepts.
There are uncovered properties of text and its political structure, which includes the
message, its sender, recipient and the context. A sender of political text is analyzed as
a subject, which defining the style of a message. The addressee of political text is
defined as a member of communication, which manifests itself in the political clarity
of it for a specific group. In the thesis is developed the scheme of comparison
semantic structure of a democratic political institutional discourse and discourse of
undemocratic regimes. There is revealed, that the political discourse of the enemy is
the basis of non-democratic discourse, and is able to penetrate to the democratic, so
that democracy is moving away from its idea. The autor discovered semantic
paradoxes of a functioning of political discourses of different regimes.
Keywords: political discourse, semantic paradoxes, discourse about the
enemy, the democratic political discourse, undemocratic political discourse,
discourse-analysis.